{"id":9627,"date":"2026-01-31T22:11:19","date_gmt":"2026-01-31T20:11:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/?page_id=9627"},"modified":"2026-02-05T12:51:33","modified_gmt":"2026-02-05T10:51:33","slug":"2021-2-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/2021-2-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2021-2-2"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Theory and practice of intellectual property
\u2116 2 \/ 2021<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ISSN (Print) 2308-0361
ISSN (Online) 2519-2744<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\" PDF (Ukrainian)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/22021.236526<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Published \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02021-05-14<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

Artificial intelligence and copyright<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Daryna Prilipko<\/strong>
Ukraine
https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5619-6186<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Abstract
<\/strong>In the article, the problems of legislation of Ukraine regarding the issues of copyright on works created due to artificial intelligence were analyzed. Particularly, who is the owner of copyright of works created due to artificial intelligence. On the one hand, it could be a developer of a computer program, from the other hand, it could be a client or an employer. Because, it could happen that there is a situation when robots created something new and original, e.g., how it happened with the project \u201cNew Rembrandt\u201d. In this case, computers created a unique portrait of Rembrandt. And here is a question, where is in this portrait original and intellectual works of developers of these computers and programs. In the contrast, this portrait could be created without people who developed special machines, programs, and computers. The article\u2019s author proposes to add into Ukrainian legislation with following norm: the owner of the copyright created due to artificial intelligence should be a natural person who uses artificial intelligence for these purposes within the official relationship or on the basis of a contract. In case of automatic generation of such work by artificial intelligence, the owner of copyright should be the developer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also, another question arises, particularly, who will be responsible for the damage caused by the artificial intelligence. As an example, of the solution for this issue Resolution 2015\/2103 (INL) was given, where is mentioned that human agent could be responsible for the caused damage. Because, it is not always a developer is responsible for the damage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also, the legislation and justice practice of foreign countries was explored. The ways of overcoming mentioned problems in legislation of Ukraine were proposed. Such as changing our legislation and giving the exact explanation in who is the owner of copyright on works created due to artificial intelligence and in which cases this person could become an owner of the copyright. However, probably, these issues should be resolved at international level regarding globalization.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords: <\/strong>copyright, work, artificial intelligence, computer program<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u041e\u043c\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0420. \u041e. \u0418\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0430\u044f \u0441\u043e\u0431\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043a\u0443\u0441\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0439 \u0438\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442. E-Management. 2020. \u2116 3 (1). C. 45\u221246.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u041f\u0440\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0442\u0430 \u0441\u0443\u043c\u0456\u0436\u043d\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 : \u0417\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u0432\u0456\u0434 23.12.1993 \u0440. \u2116\u20083792-XII.
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/card\/3792-12<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0423\u0442\u043a\u0456\u043d\u0430 \u041c. \u0421. \u041c\u043e\u0436\u043b\u0438\u0432\u0456\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0432\u0456\u0434\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0432, \u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u0448\u0442\u0443\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043c \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u043c, \u0434\u043e \u043e\u0431\u2019\u0454\u043a\u0442\u0456\u0432 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456. \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0456 \u0433\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0437\u043e\u043d\u0442\u0438. 2019. \u2116\u200817. \u0421. 54\u221258.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0412\u0430\u0441\u0438\u043b\u044c\u0454\u0432\u0430 \u0414. \u0417\u0430\u0445\u0438\u0441\u0442 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432 \u0434\u043b\u044f AI: \u0433\u0440\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u0432\u0438\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0436\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f. \u042e\u0440\u0438\u0434\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0430 \u0433\u0430\u0437\u0435\u0442\u0430. 
https:\/\/yur-gazeta.com\/publications\/practice\/informaciyne-pravo-telekomunikaciyi\/zahist-avtorskih-prav-dlya-aigranaviperedzhennya.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Miernicki M., Huang Y., Artificial intelligence and moral rights. AI & Soc. 2020.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-020-01027-6<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Noto La Diega G. Associate Professor Guido Noto La Diega\u2019s Comments on Wipo\u2019s \u2018draft Issues Paper on Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence\u2019 (WIPO\/IP\/AI\/2\/GE\/20\/1).
https:\/\/osf.io\/preprints\/lawarxiv\/c7jgh\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0411\u0443\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u041c. \u042e\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0442 \u0456 \u0417\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d. \u042e\u0440\u0438\u0434\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043d\u0430\u0443\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0439 \u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0436\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0430\u043b. 2019. \u2116 17.
https:\/\/uz.ligazakon.ua\/ua\/magazine_article<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0428\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0442\u043d\u0435\u0440 \u041c., \u0421\u0435\u0441\u0438\u0446\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0404. \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u043e\u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0430 \u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0432, \u044f\u043a\u0456 \u0433\u0435\u043d\u0435\u0440\u0443\u044e\u0442\u044c\u0441\u044f \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u0448\u0442\u0443\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443: \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0432\u0456\u0434 \u0404\u0421, \u0412\u0435\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0457 \u0411\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u0456\u0457 \u0442\u0430 \u0421\u0428\u0410. \u0427\u0430\u0441\u043e\u043f\u0438\u0441 \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0443\u043d\u0456\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0442\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430. 2018. \u2116 4. \u0421. 217.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hristov K. Artificial Intelligence and the Copyright Dilemma. IDEA: The Journal of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property. University of New Hampshire. New Hampshire, 2017. \u2116 57. P. 441.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dickenson J., Morgan A., Clark B. Creative machines: ownership of copyright in content created by artificial intelligence applications. European Intellectual Property Review. Sweet & Maxwell. London, 2017. Vol. 39, \u2116 8. P. 458.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ihalainen J. Computer creativity: artificial intelligence and copyright. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. Oxford University Press. Oxford, 2018. Vol.13, \u2116 9. P. 726.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u041c\u0456\u043b\u0456\u0446\u0456\u043d\u0430 \u041a. \u041e\u0431\u2019\u0454\u043a\u0442\u0438, \u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0456 \u0437\u0430 \u0434\u043e\u043f\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0433\u043e\u044e \u0448\u0442\u0443\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443 \u0456 \u0448\u0442\u0443\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043c \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u043c \u0431\u0435\u0437\u043f\u043e\u0441\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u044c\u043e, \u0442\u0430 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0421\u0428\u0410. \u041f\u0456\u0434\u043f\u0440\u0438\u0454\u043c\u043d\u0438\u0446\u0442\u0432\u043e, \u0433\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e. 2019. \u2116 5. \u0421. 343\u2212346.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ZHOU Bo. Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Protection – Judicial Practice in Chinese Courts.
https:\/\/www.wipo.int\/export\/sites\/www\/aboutip\/en\/artificial_intelligence\/conversation_ip_ai\/pdf\/ms_china_1_en.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Theory and practice of intellectual property\u2116 2 \/ 2021 ISSN (Print) 2308-0361ISSN (Online) 2519-2744 DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/22021.236526 Published \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02021-05-14 Artificial intelligence and copyright Daryna PrilipkoUkrainehttps:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5619-6186 AbstractIn the article, the problems of legislation of Ukraine regarding the issues of copyright on works created due to artificial intelligence were analyzed. Particularly, who is the owner of copyright of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-9627","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9627"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9627\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9977,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9627\/revisions\/9977"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}