![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/018-cover-734x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nTheory and practice of intellectual property
\u2116 5 \/ 2021<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ISSN (Print) 2308-0361
ISSN (Online) 2519-2744<\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/test.inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/free-icon-pdf-201153.png\"){kind=icon}
PDF (Ukrainian)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nDOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/52021.244525<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Published \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02021-11-17<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n Objection to the trademark application or the action of Olesia Kharchenko<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Abstract It is determined that this right in Ukraine can be exercised within several instances:<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1) objection of a third party, which is filed at the stage of examination of the designation;<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2) objection of a third party, which is submitted to the Appeals Chamber of the National Intellectual Property Authority;<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3) appeal of the approved decision of the Appeals Chamber of the National Intellectual Property Authority in court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The article provides suggestions for improving the procedure for filing objections to an application for a trademark or the action of international registration of a trademark in Ukraine:<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1) granting the right to third parties to submit to the National Intellectual Property Authority free observations against trademark applications that do not relate to \u00abrelative\u00bb grounds for refusal of the legal protection of the designation;<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2) increase the fee for filing an objection to a trademark application or international trademark registration to reduce the number of filing of unscrupulous objections, the purpose of which is to increase the term of registration of the applicant’s trademark;<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3) extension of the terms of payment of the state fee for issuing a certificate of Ukraine for a trademark and the fee for the publication of the issuance of a certificate for up to five months for those applications for trademarks against which third parties have filed objections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Keywords: <\/strong>objection, opposition, trademark, appellate chamber, period of opposition<\/p>\n\n\n\n References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u041f\u0440\u043e \u0432\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0437\u043c\u0456\u043d \u0434\u043e \u0434\u0435\u044f\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0437\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0432\u0447\u0438\u0445 \u0430\u043a\u0442\u0456\u0432 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u0449\u043e\u0434\u043e \u043f\u043e\u0441\u0438\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u043e\u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0438 \u0456 \u0437\u0430\u0445\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432 \u043d\u0430 \u0442\u043e\u0440\u0433\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0456 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u043a\u0438 \u0456 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0456 \u0437\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043a\u0438 \u0442\u0430 \u0431\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0442\u044c\u0431\u0438 \u0437 \u043f\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u043d\u0438\u043c\u0438 \u0437\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0436\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\u043c\u0438 : \u0417\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u0432\u0456\u0434 21 \u043b\u0438\u043f\u043d\u044f 2020 \u0440\u043e\u043a\u0443 \u2116 815-\u0406\u0425. \u0412\u0456\u0434\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0420\u0430\u0434\u0438 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 (\u0412\u0412\u0420). 2020. \u2116 51. \u0421\u0442. 481.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0420\u0435\u0433\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442 \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u041f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0443 \u0456 \u0420\u0430\u0434\u0438 (\u0404\u0421) \u2116 2017\/1001 \u0432\u0456\u0434 14 \u0447\u0435\u0440\u0432\u043d\u044f 2017 \u0440\u043e\u043a\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u043e \u0442\u043e\u0440\u0433\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0443 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u043a\u0443 \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0421\u043e\u044e\u0437\u0443 (\u043a\u043e\u0434\u0438\u0444\u0456\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f). Krechevsky Curtis. TRADEMARK OPPOSITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. \u041f\u043e\u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044c \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0442\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u044f\u0432\u043e\u043a \u043d\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0454\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044e \u0442\u043e\u0440\u0433\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043c\u0430\u0440\u043e\u043a \u0432 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0456 \u0432 \u043f\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0432\u043d\u044f\u043d\u043d\u0456 \u0437 \u0404\u0421 \u0442\u0430 \u0421\u0428\u0410. \u0406\u0414\u0421 \u00ab\u0412\u0456\u0434\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u043e \u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d \u0434\u0456\u043b\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0434\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0437\u0430 \u0437\u0430\u044f\u0432\u043a\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u043d\u0430 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u043a\u0438 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0456\u0432 \u0456 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0433\u00bb. \u041f\u0440\u043e \u043e\u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0443 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432 \u043d\u0430 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u043a\u0438 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0456\u0432 \u0456 \u043f\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0443\u0433 : \u0417\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u0412\u0456\u0434\u043e\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0420\u0430\u0434\u0438 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 (\u0412\u0412\u0420). 1994. \u2116 7. \u0421\u0442. 36.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u041b\u0438\u0441\u0442 \u041c\u0456\u043d\u0435\u043a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0456\u043a\u0438 \u2116 2321-06\/53904-07 \u0432\u0456\u0434 03.09.2020 \u0440. \u041f\u0440\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0434\u0436\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u041f\u043e\u0440\u044f\u0434\u043a\u0443 \u0441\u043f\u043b\u0430\u0442\u0438 \u0437\u0431\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0432 \u0437\u0430 \u0434\u0456\u0457, \u043f\u043e\u0432\u2019\u044f\u0437\u0430\u043d\u0456 \u0437 \u043e\u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043e\u044e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432 \u043d\u0430 \u043e\u0431\u02bc\u0454\u043a\u0442\u0438 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 : \u043f\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u041a\u0430\u0431\u0456\u043d\u0435\u0442\u0443 \u041c\u0456\u043d\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0456\u0432 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u0432\u0456\u0434 23 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u044f 2004 \u0440. \u2116 1716. \u041f\u0440\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0434\u0436\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0420\u0435\u0433\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0443 \u0410\u043f\u0435\u043b\u044f\u0446\u0456\u0439\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u043f\u0430\u043b\u0430\u0442\u0438 \u041d\u0430\u0446\u0456\u043e\u043d\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0440\u0433\u0430\u043d\u0443 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 : \u043d\u0430\u043a\u0430\u0437 \u041c\u0456\u043d\u0456\u0441\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0440\u043e\u0437\u0432\u0438\u0442\u043a\u0443 \u0435\u043a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0456\u043a\u0438, \u0442\u043e\u0440\u0433\u0456\u0432\u043b\u0456 \u0442\u0430 \u0441\u0456\u043b\u044c\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0433\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0440\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u0432\u0456\u0434 02.03.2021 \u0440. \u2116 433. Theory and practice of intellectual property\u2116 5 \/ 2021 ISSN (Print) 2308-0361ISSN (Online) 2519-2744 DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/52021.244525 Published \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02021-11-17 Objection to the trademark application or the action ofinternational registration of a trademark in Ukraine Olesia KharchenkoUkrainehttps:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5925-955X AbstractThe article analyses the main approaches to the practice of filing and the consequences of filing objections of third parties […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-9475","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9475","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9475"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9475\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9478,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9475\/revisions\/9478"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CC-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
international registration of a trademark in Ukraine<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ukraine
https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5925-955X<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>The article analyses the main approaches to the practice of filing and the consequences of filing objections of third parties against trademark applications or international trademark registrations based on a study of the provisions of regulations of Ukraine and foreign countries. The filing of an objection to an application for a trademark is defined as the right of any third party to state its views on the inconsistency of the designation applied for registration with the conditions of granting legal protection. It is concluded that this procedure in Ukraine is not fully harmonized with the practice of the European Union: Ukrainian law does not provide for the submission \u2014 of observation of third parties, when the trademark cannot be registered ex officio. Such observation can be submitted by any person free of charge, but this person will not become a party to the proceedings during the designation examination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/984_003-17#Text<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/ipo.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/Trademark-Oppositions-in-the-United-State_CKrechevsky_Final_As-Published-by-ECTA_052714.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/synergy.ua\/podannya-zaperechen-proty-zayavok-na-reyestracziyu-torgovelnyh-marok-v-ukrayini-v-porivnyanni-z-yes-ta-ssha\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/base.uipv.org\/searchTMStat\/search.php<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/osnova\/posts\/4085139544846869<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/1716-2004-%D0%BF#Text<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/z0610-21#n10<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"