![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/018-cover-734x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nTheory and practice of intellectual property
\u2116 3 \/ 2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ISSN (Print) 2308-0361
ISSN (Online) 2519-2744<\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/test.inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/free-icon-pdf-201153.png\"){kind=icon}
PDF (Ukrainian)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nDOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/32022.262624<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Published 2022-08-09<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n Problems of patenting inventions created using artificial Gennadiy Androshchuk<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Abstract The main provisions of the draft law \u00abOn Amendments to the Law of Ukraine\u00bb On Protection of Rights to Inventions and Utility Models \u00abon the regulation of relations arising in relation to inventions and utility models created using artificial intelligence\u00bb are considered. It is concluded that the Law on the Protection of Rights to Inventions and Utility Models excludes computer programs from patented objects. Their minority is stated in the total number of filed applications and issued patents. Between 1980 and 2018, only 740 such applications were published (1.26% of the total). The rules for compiling, submitting and reviewing an application for an invention (utility model) in Ukraine are outdated and do not reflect aspects of AI. Only a comprehensive approach (changes in legislation and improvement of expertise) will solve this problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Keywords: <\/strong>intellectual property, artificial intelligence, inventor, software, examination, patent, digital transformation<\/p>\n\n\n\n References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0410\u043d\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0449\u0443\u043a \u0413. \u041e. \u041f\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0443\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0432\u0438\u043d\u0430\u0445\u043e\u0434\u0456\u0432, \u0440\u0435\u0430\u043b\u0456\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043f\u02bc\u044e\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0456: \u043a\u0435\u0440\u0456\u0432\u043d\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u0446\u0438\u043f\u0438 \u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430 \u0404\u041f\u0412. \u041f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c\u0438 \u0442\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0457 \u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0457 \u0435\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0438 \u0437 \u043f\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u044c \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 (\u00ab\u041a\u0440\u0430\u0439\u043d\u0454\u0432\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0456 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\u00bb) : \u043c\u0430\u0442\u0435\u0440. IV \u041c\u0456\u0436\u043d\u0430\u0440. \u043d\u0430\u0443\u043a.-\u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442. \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0444. (24 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u044f 2020 \u0440., \u043c. \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432) ; \u0437\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0434. \u0430\u043a\u0430\u0434. \u041d\u0410\u041f\u0440\u041d \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u041e. \u0412. \u0421\u043a\u0440\u0438\u043f\u043d\u044e\u043a\u0430 \u0456 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0444. \u0412. \u041b. \u0424\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0440\u0435\u043d\u043a\u0430 \/ \u041d\u0414\u0426\u0421\u0415 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0457 \u0435\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0438 \u0437 \u043f\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u044c \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u041c\u0456\u043d\u02bc\u044e\u0441\u0442\u0443. \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432 : \u041b\u0456\u0440\u0430, 2020. \u0421. 54\u221268.<\/p>\n\n\n\n New Guidelines for Examination 2022 enter into force. URL: EPO \u2014 New Guidelines for Examination 2022 enter into force.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Aaron Wininger CNIPA Announces Amended Patent Guidelines for Patent Applications Covering AI and Blockchain. URL: CNIPA Announces Amended Patent Guidelines for Patent Applications Covering AI and Blockchain \u2014 China IP Law Update.<\/p>\n\n\n\n October 2019 Update: Subject Matter Eligibility. URL: October 2019 Update: Subject Matter Eligibility (uspto.gov).<\/p>\n\n\n\n WEN XIE What is AI and How is it Treated by the USPTO, EPO and CNIPA? URL: What is AI and How is it Treated by the USPTO, EPO and CNIPA? (ipwatchdog.com).<\/p>\n\n\n\n European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015\/2103(INL)). Resolution 2020 \u2013 Study Question \u2013 Patents Inventorship of inventions made using Artificial Intelligence. James Nurton Decision Could Provide an Answer to AI Inventorship. German Decision Could Provide an Answer to AI Inventorship (ipwatchdog.com).<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u041d\u0430 \u043e\u043d\u043b\u0430\u0439\u043d-\u043a\u043e\u043d\u0444\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0456\u0457 \u0404\u041f\u0412 \u0440\u043e\u0437\u0433\u043b\u044f\u043d\u0443\u043b\u0438 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u0432\u0456\u0434 \u0432\u0437\u0430\u0454\u043c\u043e\u0434\u0456\u0457 \u0437 \u0410\u0406 \u0432 \u043f\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0442\u043d\u0456\u0439 \u043f\u043b\u043e\u0449\u0438\u043d\u0456. AI in Eastern Europe Industry Landscape. AI Readiness Index 2020. Government AI Readiness Index 2021. 2022 International IP Index Compete for Tomorrow.![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CC-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
intelligence: doctrine and practice<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ukraine
https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0781-9740<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>The dynamics of development of the world market of artificial intelligence (AI), patent activity in this field, problematic issues arising in connection with the patenting of inventions created using AI are studied. Aspects of doctrine formation and policy development in the field of intellectual property (IP) and AI are considered. Features of examination of patentability of inventions created with the use of AI in different jurisdictions (EPO, USA, Germany, China), foreign legislation, doctrinal positions and case law in this field are analysed. According to the analysis of the Artificial Inventor project, DABUS applications indicating the AI system as the inventor, submitted in 17 jurisdictions, were mostly rejected at the level of intellectual property offices and as a result of court appeals. In general, the applicant failed to persuade the IP courts and agencies with his arguments, despite differences in national law and patent systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=CELEX%3A52017IP0051<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/aippi.nl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Adopted-Resolution-Q272-Patents-Inventorship-of-inventions-made-using-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/ukrpatent.org\/uk\/news\/main\/epo-inventorship-in-patent-law-18052022<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/mindmaps.dka.global\/ai-in-eastern-europe<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.oxfordinsights.com\/government-ai-readiness-index-2020<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.oxfordinsights.com\/government-ai-readiness-index2021<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
2022-IP-Index-Final-Report.pdf (theglobalipcenter.com).<\/p>\n\n\n\n