![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/018-cover-734x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nTheory and practice of intellectual property
\u2116 6 \/ 2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ISSN (Print) 2308-0361
ISSN (Online) 2519-2744<\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/test.inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/free-icon-pdf-201153.png\"){kind=icon}
PDF (Ukrainian)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nDOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/62022.274648<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Published 2022-12-16<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n Some aspects of judicial protection of civil legal relations Andrii Shabalin<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Abstract Keywords: <\/strong>intellectual property law, codification, EU, civil procedure, civil law, CPC of Estonia<\/p>\n\n\n\n References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Riigi Teataja. Code of Civil Procedure. Site Riigiteataja.ee. Jurist AITB. Site uristaitab.ee. Consultative Council of European Judges. Site Coe.int. Supreme Court of Estonia. Site Riigikohus.ee. \u041f\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0448\u043a\u0443\u0440\u0430 \u0412. \u0412. \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u0432\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0433\u0443\u043b\u044e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f \u044e\u0440\u0438\u0434\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u0456\u0434\u043f\u043e\u0432\u0456\u0434\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0434\u0456\u0432 \u0432 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0456 \u0442\u0430 \u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0445-\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0430\u0445 \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0421\u043e\u044e\u0437\u0443: \u0442\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0456 \u0442\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043d\u0456 \u0430\u0441\u043f\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0438 : \u043c\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0444\u0456\u044f. \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432 : \u0413\u0435\u043b\u044c\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430, 2017. \u0421. 204.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Shaping Europe\u02bcs digital future. Site European Commission.![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CC-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
in Estonia<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ukraine
https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8536-5081<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>The scientific article examines the peculiarities of the civil procedural order for the protection of law in Estonia. Attention is paid to the genesis of modern Estonian civil justice, the peculiarities of some civil legal procedures for consideration and resolution of civil cases are established. It is concluded that all civil legal disputes are resolved according to the rules of civil proceedings, including disputes about the protection of intellectual property rights and the protection of ownership rights to immovable property. Instead, there are exceptions \u2014 these are disputes related to European patents, which are resolved in accordance with the Agreement on the Unified European Patent Court. This approach is fully in line with the pan-European digitalization strategy. Attention is also paid to the implementation of European legal standards in civil justice in Estonia. Thus, it is indicated that Estonian courts must follow the relevant practice of the European Court of Human Rights when deciding civil cases. In Estonia, the Supreme Court can turn to the European Court of Human Rights for an advisory decision on the application, interpretation, and interpretation of the law guaranteed by the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Moreover, the participants in the legal process, in case of disagreement with the decision of the Estonian courts, including the Supreme Court of Estonia, have the right to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU. It is stated that in the Estonian civil process there is a special procedure for the collection of evidence in accordance with the requests of the EU member states to Estonia. Based on the research, theoretical conclusions and recommendations of relatively effective ways of updating (unification, codification) Ukrainian legislation were formulated, in particular in the aspect of its adaptation to EU legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.riigiteataja.ee\/en\/eli\/ee\/Riigikogu\/act\/512122019004\/consolide<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.riigiteataja.ee\/en\/eli\/ee\/Riigikogu\/act\/512122019004\/consolide<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.coe.int\/en\/web\/ccje\/-\/2019-edition-of-the-report-on-judicial-independence-and-impartiality-in-the-council-of-europe-member-states<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.riigikohus.ee\/et\/rahvusvaheline-koostoo\/kohtute-koostoo-euroopa-noukogus<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/digital-single-market\/en\/content\/european-digital-strategy<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n