![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/018-cover-734x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nTheory and practice of intellectual property
\u2116 1-2 \/ 2023<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ISSN (Print) 2308-0361
ISSN (Online) 2519-2744<\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/test.inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/free-icon-pdf-201153.png\"){kind=icon}
PDF (Ukrainian)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nDOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/1-22023.277141<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Submitted 2023-01-23 <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n Originality of the creation: legislative innovations and prospects for its implementation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Yurii R\u0456abchenko<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Abstract Keywords: <\/strong>originality, creation, creative character, protectability, proof, presumption, justice<\/p>\n\n\n\n References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0411\u0435\u0440\u043d\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0456\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e \u043e\u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0443 \u043b\u0456\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u0456 \u0445\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0436\u043d\u0456\u0445 \u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0432 \u0432\u0456\u0434 24.07.1971 \u0440. \u041f\u0440\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0441\u0443\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430\u043c\u0438 \u043d\u043e\u0440\u043c \u0437\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0443 \u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0445\u0438\u0441\u0442 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0456 \u0441\u0443\u043c\u0456\u0436\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432: \u043f\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u041f\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0443\u043c\u0443 \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0443 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u0432\u0456\u0434 04.06.2010 \u0440. \u2116 5. \u0412\u0456\u0441\u043d\u0438\u043a \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0443 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438. 2010. \u2116 6. \u0421. 4.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u041f\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0421\u0443\u0434\u0443 \u0443 \u0441\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0434\u0456 \u043a\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0433\u0456\u0457 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0434\u0456\u0432 \u041f\u0435\u0440\u0448\u043e\u0457 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0457 \u043f\u0430\u043b\u0430\u0442\u0438 \u041a\u0430\u0441\u0430\u0446\u0456\u0439\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0446\u0438\u0432\u0456\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0443 \u0432\u0456\u0434 06.07.2022 \u0440. \u0421\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u2116 757\/49265\/19-\u0446. \u041f\u0440\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0456 \u0441\u0443\u043c\u0456\u0436\u043d\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430: \u0417\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u0432\u0456\u0434 01.12.2022 \u0440. \u2116 2811-IX. \u0413\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0441 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u043e\u0444\u0456\u0446\u0456\u0439\u043d\u0435 \u0432\u0438\u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0432\u0456\u0434 31.12.2022. \u2116 267.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Directive 2009\/24\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs. Directive 2006\/116\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights. Judgment of the Court of 11 June 2020, Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech\/Get2Get, C\u2011833\/18, EU:C:2020:461. \u0422\u043e\u043c\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0432 \u0406. \u041f\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0443\u043c\u043f\u0446\u0456\u044f \u043e\u0440\u0438\u0433\u0456\u043d\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0443: \u043f\u043e\u0442\u0440\u0456\u0431\u043d\u0430 \u0447\u0438 \u043d\u0456? Rosati E. Originality in EU Copyright Full Harmonization through Case Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited (UK); Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. (USA). 2013. 271 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Order of the Court of 30 January 2018, Murphy v EUIPO, C\u2011538\/17 P, EU:C:2018:47. \u041a\u0435\u0442\u0440\u0430\u0440\u044c \u0410. \u0410. \u041f\u043e\u043d\u044f\u0442\u0442\u044f \u0442\u0430 \u043e\u0437\u043d\u0430\u043a\u0438 \u043e\u0431’\u0454\u043a\u0442\u0430 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430. \u0410\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0435\u043c\u0438 \u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u0432\u0438 \u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430. 2011. \u0412\u0438\u043f. 59. \u0421. 416-422.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u041a\u043b\u0435\u0439\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0421.\u041c. \u0414\u043e \u043f\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e \u043e\u0431’\u0454\u043a\u0442 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430. \u0414\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e: \u0417\u0431. \u043d\u0430\u0443\u043a. \u043f\u0440. \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432: \u0406\u0414\u0456\u041f \u041d\u0410\u041d \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438. 2003. \u0412\u0438\u043f. 19. \u0421. 371-378.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0428\u0442\u0435\u0444\u0430\u043d \u0410. \u0421. \u0410\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0456 \u0441\u0443\u043c\u0456\u0436\u043d\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430: \u043e\u0441\u043e\u0431\u043b\u0438\u0432\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0457 \u043e\u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0438, \u0437\u0434\u0456\u0439\u0441\u043d\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430\u0445\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0443: \u043c\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0444\u0456\u044f. \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432: \u041d\u0414\u0406 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u041d\u0410\u041f\u0440\u041d\u0423, \u0422\u041e\u0412 \u00ab\u041d\u0412\u041f \u0406\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0456\u0441\u00bb, 2017. 150 \u0441.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0428\u0442\u0435\u0444\u0430\u043d \u041e. \u041e. \u041f\u043e\u043d\u044f\u0442\u0442\u044f \u043e\u0431\u2019\u0454\u043a\u0442\u0430 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0442\u0430 \u043a\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0456\u0457\u0432 \u0439\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043e\u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0437\u0434\u0430\u0442\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456. \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456. 2006. \u2116 6. \u0421. 3-8.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u041a\u0430\u043f\u0456\u0446\u0430 \u042e.\u041c. \u0423\u043d\u0456\u0444\u0456\u043a\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f \u0456 \u0433\u0430\u0440\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0456\u0437\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f \u0437\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430 \u0437 \u043e\u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u0432-\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0456\u0432 \u0404\u0421 \u0442\u0430 \u0437\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0434\u0430\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438: \u0434\u0438\u0441. … \u0434-\u0440\u0430 \u044e\u0440\u0438\u0434.\u043d\u0430\u0443\u043a: 12.00.03. \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432, 2019. 477 \u0441. The Routledge Handbook of EU Copyright Law. Ed: Eleonora Rosati. New York: Routledge. 2021. 550 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rendas T. Exceptions in EU Copyright Law: In Search of a Balance Between Flexibility and Legal Certainty. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International B.V., 2021. 464 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Stamatoudi I., Torremans P. EU Copyright Law: A Commentary. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited (UK); Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. (USA), 2014. 1264 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bently L., Sherman B., Gangjee D., Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 1428 p.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Cassation partielle: solution Cour de cassation, Assembl\u00e9e Pl\u00e9ni\u00e8re, du 7 mars 1986 \u00e0 la pourvoi \u2116\u00b0 83-10.477. Council Directive 91\/250\/EEC of 14 May 1991 on the legal protection of computer programs. Judgment of the Court of 16 July 2009, Infopaq International, C-5\/08, EU:C:2009:465. Judgment of the Court of 12 September 2019, Cofemel \u2014 Sociedade de Vestu\u00e1rio SA v G-Star Raw CV, C\u2011683\/17, EU:C:2019:721. Judgment of the Court of 29 July 2019, Funke Medien NRW, C\u2011469\/17, EU:C:2019:623. Opinion of Advocate General Campos S\u00e1nchez-Bordona of 31 May 2016, Montis Design BV v Goossens Meubelen BV, C\u2011169\/15, EU:C:2016:383. Code de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle Version en vigueur au 21 f\u00e9vrier 2023. Le droit d\u2019auteur d\u2019un intervenant lors d\u2019une s\u00e9ance p\u00e9dagogique \/\/ Reseau-Canope. \u0152uvre g\u00e9n\u00e9r\u00e9e par une intelligence artificielle : quelle alternative \u00e0 la protection par le droit d\u2019auteur? \/\/ Affiches-PARISIENNES. Gesetz \u00fcber Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte (Urheberrechtsgesetz). Ley de Propiedad Intelectual. Ustawa z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych. Code de droit \u00e9conomique. Codice civile. Grundwissen zum Urheberrecht \u2013 Teil 1 Von Wiss. Mitarbeiter Julian Kanert, Wiss. Mitarbeiterin Stefanie Meyer, Chemnitz \/\/ ZJS \u2013 Zeitschrift f\u00fcr das Juristische Studium. Urheberrecht in der Wissenschaft \u2013 Was gilt es zu beachten? \/\/ QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING DEUTSCHLAND. Fern\u00e1ndez F.R., Chornet V.G., Guti\u00e9rrez J.V.O. Docentes, discentes y trabajos acad\u00e9micos: Propiedad Intelectual en conflicto. REVISTA DE EDUCACI\u00d3N Y DERECHO. EDUCATION AND LAW REVIEW. N\u00famero 22 Abril-Septiembre 2020. \u0420. 1-23. Votre cr\u00e9ation est elle prot\u00e9geable par le droit d\u2019auteur ? \/\/ DES DROITS, DES AUTEURS Le blog d\u00e9di\u00e9 au droit d\u2019auteur. \u0428\u043b\u044f\u0445\u0438 \u0432\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u043b\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u043e\u0437\u043d\u0430\u043a \u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0447\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0445\u0430\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0443 \u043d\u0430\u0443\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0445 \u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0456 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0457 \u0435\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0438 \/\/ \u0426\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0440 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0457 \u0435\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0438 \u0442\u0430 \u0435\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0442\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u0434\u043e\u0441\u043b\u0456\u0434\u0436\u0435\u043d\u044c. \u0421\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u0435\u043a\u0441\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0437\u0430 \u043e\u0431’\u0454\u043a\u0442\u0456\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0432 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0456: \u043d\u0430\u0432\u0447.-\u043c\u0435\u0442\u043e\u0434. \u0432\u0438\u0434\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f \/ \u0412.\u041b. \u0424\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0440\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e (\u043a\u0435\u0440. \u0430\u0432\u0442. \u043a\u043e\u043b.), \u041e.\u0413. \u0410\u0434\u043b\u0435\u0440, \u041b.\u041f. \u0422\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0449\u0438\u043a, \u041d.\u041c. \u041a\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043e\u0432\u0430, \u041e.\u0412. \u0413\u043e\u043b\u0456\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430, \u0422.\u041c. \u0427\u0430\u0431\u0430\u043d\u0435\u0446\u044c \u0442\u0430 \u0456\u043d.; \u0437\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0434. \u0412.\u041b. \u0424\u0435\u0434\u043e\u0440\u0435\u043d\u043a\u0430. \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432: \u041b\u0456\u0440\u0430-\u041a, 2022. 196 \u0441.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0426\u0438\u0432\u0456\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438. \u0417\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0430 \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043d\u0430: \u043f\u0456\u0434\u0440\u0443\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a \/ \u0437\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0434. \u041e.\u0412. \u0414\u0437\u0435\u0440\u0438, \u041d.\u0421. \u041a\u0443\u0437\u043d\u0454\u0446\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0457, \u0420.\u0410. \u041c\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430. \u041a\u0438\u0457\u0432: \u042e\u0440\u0456\u043d\u043a\u043e\u043c \u0406\u043d\u0442\u0435\u0440, 2018. 976 \u0441.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u041f\u043e\u044f\u0441\u043d\u044e\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0430 \u0437\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u0434\u043e \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443 \u0417\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d\u0443 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u00ab\u041f\u0440\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0456 \u0441\u0443\u043c\u0456\u0436\u043d\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430\u00bb. Theory and practice of intellectual property\u2116 1-2 \/ 2023 ISSN (Print) 2308-0361ISSN (Online) 2519-2744 DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/1-22023.277141 Submitted 2023-01-23Accepted 2023-03-23Published 2023-03-27 Originality of the creation: legislative innovations and prospects for its implementation Yurii R\u0456abchenkoDoctor of Legal Sciences\/Dr. Habil. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Private Law of the State Tax UniversityUkrainehttps:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1328-700X […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-8740","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8740"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8740\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9843,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8740\/revisions\/9843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Accepted 2023-03-23
Published 2023-03-27<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CC-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Doctor of Legal Sciences\/Dr. Habil. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Private Law of the State Tax University
Ukraine
https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1328-700X<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>In the context of the ongoing processes of implementation of the norms of EU law on copyright and related rights to the national legislation on copyright and related rights, the article raises the problem of different scientific approaches in the EU and in Ukraine regarding the perception of the concept of originality of a work. Therefore, the article is devoted to the assessment of legislative innovations regarding the determination of the originality of creation in clause 35 of Art. 1 of the Law “On Copyright and Related Rights”, providing a characterization of their value for the scientific and law enforcement spheres. The main provisions of the concept of originality under EU law regarding copyright and related rights were determined, and an analysis of scientific views and provisions regarding the originality of creation in national copyright law was carried out. On the basis of the conducted analysis, differences in the understanding of the concept of originality in the EU law regarding copyright and related rights and in national copyright law have been determined. A comparative analysis of the doctrine, legislation, and judicial practice of the EU regarding the issue of the distribution of the burden of proving the originality in court and the relevant sources of the national system of copyright protection regarding the judicial establishment of the creative nature of the author’s work in creating creation is provided. Based on the relationship between the concepts of “originality”, “creative character”, “creation”, as well as the results of the comparative analysis, it is noted that there is a “presumption of originality” of literary and artistic works (within the meaning of Article 2 of the Berne Convention) in the national copyright protection system, which consists in the assumption that a creation on which an author is indicated, and this author goes to court to protect his violated, unrecognized, contested copyright, is considered original until proven otherwise. It is justified that the originality of the creation is enshrined in clause 35 of Art. 1 of the Law “On Copyright and Related Rights” as a criterion for the provision of legal protection. The significance of the legislative consolidation of the originality of creation in the law-making and law-enforcing spheres is outlined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/995_051#Text<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/105139782<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/data.europa.eu\/eli\/dir\/2009\/24\/oj<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/data.europa.eu\/eli\/dir\/2006\/116\/oj<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&docid=227305&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3325549<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/www.legalshift.com.ua\/?p=1332<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=originality&docid=199063&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=2730520#ctx1<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/nrat.ukrintei.ua\/searchdoc\/0519U001601\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/juri\/id\/JURITEXT000007016934\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/data.europa.eu\/eli\/dir\/1991\/250\/oj<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&docid=72482&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3317256<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=cofemel&docid=217668&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3317256#ctx1<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&docid=216545&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3324863<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=originality&docid=179081&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=2730520#ctx1<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/id\/LEGITEXT000006069414<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.reseau-canope.fr\/savoirscdi\/societe-de-linformation\/cadre-reglementaire\/le-coin-du-juriste\/le-droit-dauteur-dun-intervenant-lors-dune-seance-pedagogique.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.affiches-parisiennes.com\/oeuvre-generee-par-une-intelligence-artificielle-quelle-alternative-a-la-protection-par-le-droit-d-auteur-119354.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.gesetze-im-internet.de\/urhg\/BJNR012730965.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.boe.es\/buscar\/pdf\/1996\/BOE-A-1996-8930-consolidado.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/isap.sejm.gov.pl\/isap.nsf\/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu19940240083<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/www.ejustice.just.fgov.be\/eli\/loi\/2013\/02\/28\/2013A11134\/justel<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.gazzettaufficiale.it\/dettaglio\/codici\/codiceCivile<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.zjs-online.com\/dat\/artikel\/2020_5_1424.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.zjs-online.com\/dat\/artikel\/2020_5_1424.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/dialnet.unirioja.es\/descarga\/articulo\/7639977.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/desdroitsdesauteurs.fr\/2016\/09\/la-notion-doriginalite-en-droit-dauteur\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/ics.gov.ua\/expert\/useful\/publications\/359389\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/itd.rada.gov.ua\/billInfo\/Bills\/Card\/26951<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"