![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/018-cover-734x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nTheory and practice of intellectual property
\u2116 4 \/ 2025<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ISSN (Print) 2308-0361
ISSN (Online) 2519-2744<\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/test.inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/free-icon-pdf-201153.png\"){kind=icon}
PDF (Ukrainian)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nDOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/42025.346583<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Submitted 2025-11-04 <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n Author\u2019s moral rights in the EU: legal features<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Serhii Butnik-Siverskyi<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Abstract It is concluded that EU legislation, both primary and secondary, does not contain the regulation of the author’s moral rights, leaving this to the legislation of the EU Member States, taking into account international regulatory legal acts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The practice of the CJEU is not directly related to the moral rights of the author, but concerns related issues, namely: a fair balance between the protection of copyright and freedom of expression, the legitimate interest of copyright holders that the work is not associated with a parody that conveys a discriminatory message, as well as considering a work as a reflection of the personality of its author.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the dualistic model of copyright, moral rights are separated from the author’s economic rights and are generally valid indefinitely, in contrast to the monistic model, where the term of protection is limited in time, since moral and economic rights are considered as a single copyright. In both models, there is a right to disclose a work and a right to withdraw a work (although not in all countries), but the monistic model links them to the exercise of the economic right to use, in contrast to the dualistic model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In Ireland, it is separately distinguished the right to counteract false attribution of authorship to a work; the possibility to waive the moral rights, and the limitation of their validity in time are provided.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The legal features of the author’s moral rights regulation in different EU countries necessitate their consideration when using works and protecting the author’s moral rights in the territories of different states. They can be used in the legislative process in Ukraine by borrowing the relevant legal provisions, taking into account national approaches to legislative regulation in the copyright field.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Keywords: <\/strong>moral rights, author\u2019s personal rights, copyright, European Union<\/p>\n\n\n\n References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0411\u0435\u0440\u043d\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0430 \u043a\u043e\u043d\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0456\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e \u043e\u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0443 \u043b\u0456\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u0456 \u0445\u0443\u0434\u043e\u0436\u043d\u0456\u0445 \u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0432 (\u041f\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0437\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0410\u043a\u0442 \u0432\u0456\u0434 24 \u043b\u0438\u043f\u043d\u044f 1971 \u0440\u043e\u043a\u0443, \u0437\u043c\u0456\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 2 \u0436\u043e\u0432\u0442\u043d\u044f 1979 \u0440\u043e\u043a\u0443). \u0423\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e \u0442\u043e\u0440\u0433\u043e\u0432\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0456 \u0430\u0441\u043f\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0438 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456. \u0414\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0432\u0456\u0440 \u0412\u041e\u0406\u0412 \u043f\u0440\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0432\u0456\u0434 20 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u044f 1996 \u0440\u043e\u043a\u0443. \u0417\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0430 \u0434\u0435\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432 \u043b\u044e\u0434\u0438\u043d\u0438 \u0432\u0456\u0434 10 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u044f 1948 \u0440\u043e\u043a\u0443. \u041c\u0456\u0436\u043d\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u043a\u0442 \u043f\u0440\u043e \u0435\u043a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0456\u0447\u043d\u0456, \u0441\u043e\u0446\u0456\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0456 \u0456 \u043a\u0443\u043b\u044c\u0442\u0443\u0440\u043d\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0432\u0456\u0434 16 \u0433\u0440\u0443\u0434\u043d\u044f 1966 \u0440\u043e\u043a\u0443. \u0414\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0432\u0456\u0440 \u043f\u0440\u043e \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u0421\u043e\u044e\u0437 \u0432\u0456\u0434 07 \u043b\u044e\u0442\u043e\u0433\u043e 1992 \u0440. Directive 2001\/29\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Directive 2006\/116\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights. Directive (EU) 2019\/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96\/9\/EC and 2001\/29\/EC. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 September 2014 in case C\u2011201\/13, Johan Deckmyn, Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others. Rosati E. Has the CJEU in Deckmyn de facto harmonised moral rights? 2014. H\u00e4rk\u00f6nen H. Fashion and Authors\u2019 Moral Rights. GRUR International. 2024. Vol. 73(5). P. 406\u2212420. Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 December 2011 in case C\u2011145\/10, Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH and Others. Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villal\u00f3n delivered on 22 May 2014 in case C\u2011201\/13, Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others. Firaru F. Moral Rights: A Romanian Copyright Law Perspective. 2025. Code de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle. \u041c\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043a \u041b. \u041e\u0441\u043e\u0431\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u043d\u0435\u043c\u0430\u0439\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430 \u0443 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0456 \u041d\u0456\u043c\u0435\u0447\u0447\u0438\u043d\u0438 \u0456 \u0424\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0446\u0456\u0457 \u0442\u0430 \u0457\u0445 \u0432\u043f\u043b\u0438\u0432 \u043d\u0430 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438. \u0422<\/em>\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456. 2023. \u2116 1\u22122. \u0421. 34\u221244. Urheberrechtsgesetz vom 9 September 1965. Copyright and related rights Act, 2000. Hutukka, P. Copyright Law in the European Union, the United States and China. IIC. 2023. Vol. 54. P. 1044\u22121080.
Accepted 2025-11-18
Published 2025-12-15<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CC-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
PhD (Law), Patent Attorney, Acting Leading Researcher of the Copyright and Related Rights Department of the Intellectual Property Scientific Research Institute of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine
Ukraine
https:\/\/orcid.org\/<\/a>0009-0003-3242-6583<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>The article examines the regulation of the author’s personal non-property (moral) rights under international law, analyzes primary and secondary EU legislation and indirectly related practice of the CJEU in this aspect, reveals the features of the dualistic and monistic models of copyright in the EU on the example of France and Germany, considers the regulation of moral rights in Ireland (a common law country).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/995_051#Text<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/981_018#Text<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/995_770#Text<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/995_015#Text<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/995_042#Text<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/file\/text\/40\/f450346n12.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=CELEX%3A02001L0029-20190606<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/dir\/2006\/116\/oj\/eng<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/dir\/2019\/790\/oj\/eng<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&docid=157281&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=4225848<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/ipkitten.blogspot.com\/2014\/09\/has-cjeu-in-deckmyn-de-facto-harmonised.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/grurint\/ikae050<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&docid=115785&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=4796636<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&docid=152656&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=379419<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/ceelegalmatters.com\/briefings\/29903-moral-rights-a-romanian-copyright-law-perspective<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.wipo.int\/wipolex\/ru\/legislation\/details\/23227<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/1-22023.277144<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.wipo.int\/wipolex\/ru\/legislation\/details\/23030<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.irishstatutebook.ie\/eli\/2000\/act\/28\/enacted\/en\/print<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40319-023-01357-0<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n