{"id":7026,"date":"2025-12-02T14:55:17","date_gmt":"2025-12-02T12:55:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/?page_id=7026"},"modified":"2026-02-04T10:59:26","modified_gmt":"2026-02-04T08:59:26","slug":"2025-3-1","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/2025-3-1\/","title":{"rendered":"2025-3-1"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Theory and practice of intellectual property
\u2116 3 \/ 2025<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ISSN (Print) 2308-0361
ISSN (Online) 2519-2744<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\" PDF (Ukrainian)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/32025.338625<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Submitted     2025-07-30
Accepted      2025-08-13
Published      2025-09-15<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

The resale right in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Olena Starchenko<\/strong>
Ph.D. (Law),
Researcher of the Copyright and Related Rights Department of the Intellectual Property Scientific Research Institute of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine
Ukraine
https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-3252-4338<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Abstract
<\/strong>The article is devoted to the analysis of judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning the interpretation of the provisions of Directive 2001\/84\/EC of 27 September 2001 on the resale right for the benefit of the author of an original work of art. To achieve the objectives of the article, the content of the following judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union has been examined: Fundaci\u00f3n Gala-Salvador Dal\u00ed (C-518\/08, 2010) and Christie\u2019s France SNC v Syndicat national des antiquaires (C-41\/14, 2015). The study examines the main trends in harmonising the mechanisms for applying the resale right within the European legal space. Particular attention is paid to the concept of \u201cdistorting effect\u201d as understood in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the context of the resale right. Conclusions are drawn regarding the main directions of unifying the procedure for exercising the resale right in the European Union. It is established that the harmonisation mechanism under study is aimed at ensuring broad legal opportunities within national legal systems for developing local models for the implementation of the resale right. It is also noted that harmonisation of resale right legislation is limited to unifying provisions of national laws that have a direct and immediate effect on the functioning of the art market. Based on the analysis of the Court of Justice’s rulings, the article concludes that determining the specific circle of persons who inherit the resale right, or the persons responsible for paying royalties, remains within the competence of the legislator in each Member State and, according to the Court’s case law, does not have a direct impact on the functioning of the art market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The incorporation of the resale right into the national legislation of EU Member States plays a fundamentally important role in ensuring proper conditions for the protection of the economic rights of authors of artistic works and in establishing fair competition within the art market. The resale right serves as a tool for maintaining a balance between the rights of artists across different jurisdictions within the EU, and, as a result, contributes to the creation of an effective mechanism for preventing infringements and avoiding unfair competition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keywords: <\/strong>resale right, Court of Justice, Directive 2001\/84\/EC, work of art<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Directive 2001\/84\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the resale right for the benefit of the author of an original work of art, OJ L 272, 13.10.2001, pp. 32\u201336.
https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=CELEX:32001L0084<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Loi du 20 mai 1920 promulguant le droit de suite. Journal officiel de la R\u00e9publique fran\u00e7aise (22 mai 1920), texte n\u00b0 121.
https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/jorf\/id\/JORFTEXT000000869168<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

O\u2019Dwyer, \u0410. (2020). Artists\u2019 Resale Right Directive 2001\/84\/EC: A means of targeted intervention for visual artists. Journal of World Intellectual Property. Vol. 24(1 2). 2021. pp. 3\u201327.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jwip.12170<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works of 9 September 1886, as revised at Paris on 24 July 1971 and amended in 1979.
https:\/\/www.wipo.int\/treaties\/en\/ip\/berne\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gaster, J. The Resale Right Directive \/ J. Gaster ; updated by I. Stamatoudi \/\/ EU Copyright Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. \u0420p. 255\u2013272.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4337\/9781786437808.00020<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u041c\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043a \u041b. \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0441\u043b\u0456\u0434\u0443\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f: \u043d\u0430\u0431\u043b\u0438\u0438\u0436\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0434\u043e Acquis \u0404\u0421. \u0417\u043e\u0432\u043d\u0456\u0448\u043d\u044f \u0442\u043e\u0440\u0433\u0456\u0432\u043b\u044f: \u0435\u043a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u043c\u0456\u043a\u0430, \u0444\u0456\u043d\u0430\u043d\u0441\u0438, \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e. 2023. \u2116 4. \u0421. 88\u221297.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31617\/3.2023(129)08<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ginsburgh, V., McAndrew, C. Artists\u2019 resale rights \/\/ Towse, R., Snowball, J. (Eds.). Handbook of Cultural Economics. 3rd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. pp. 58\u201366.
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4337\/9781788975803.00012 <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judgment of the Court of 15 April 2010 in Case C\u2011518\/08, Fundaci\u00f3n Gala\u2011Salvador Dal\u00ed and Visual Entidad de Gesti\u00f3n de Artistas Pl\u00e1sticos (VEGAP) v Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 des auteurs dans les arts graphiques et plastiques (ADAGP) and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2010:191.
https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=CELEX:62008CJ0518<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Code de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle, version en vigueur au 19 juillet 2025, consult\u00e9 sur L\u00e9gifrance.
https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/texte_lc\/LEGITEXT00000606944\/ <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judgment of the Court of 26 February 2015 in Case C\u201141\/14, Christie\u2019s France SNC v Syndicat national des antiquaires, ECLI:EU:C:2015:119.
https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=CELEX:62014CJ0041<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Theory and practice of intellectual property\u2116 3 \/ 2025 ISSN (Print) 2308-0361ISSN (Online) 2519-2744 DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/32025.338625 Submitted     2025-07-30Accepted      2025-08-13Published      2025-09-15 The resale right in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union Olena StarchenkoPh.D. (Law), Researcher of the Copyright and Related Rights Department of the Intellectual Property Scientific […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-7026","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7026"}],"version-history":[{"count":24,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7026\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8185,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7026\/revisions\/8185"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}