![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/018-cover-734x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nTheory and practice of intellectual property
\u2116 3 \/ 2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ISSN (Print) 2308-0361
ISSN (Online) 2519-2744<\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/test.inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/free-icon-pdf-201153.png\"){kind=icon}
PDF (Ukrainian)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nDOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/tpip.2026.3.8<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Submitted 2026-07-24 <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n Balancing of public and private interests when applying copyright and neighboring rights exceptions and limitations in the EU case law<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Maksym Naumko<\/strong> Abstract Keywords: <\/strong>copyright, related rights, balance of interests, EU Directives, CJEU, artificial intelligence<\/p>\n\n\n\n References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n De Britto, V. M. (2023). The Social Function of Copyright. De Schutter, O., & Tulkens, F. (2008). The European Court of Human Rights as a Pragmatic Institution. In E. Brems (ed.), Conflicting between fundamental rights. Intersentia. Favale, M. (2008). Fine-tuning European copyright law to strike a balance between the rights of owners and users. Geiger, C., & Izyumenko, E. (2012). From Internal to External Balancing, and Back? Copyright Limitations and Fundamental Rights in the Digital Environment. Izyumenko, E., & Geiger, C. (2025). Freedom of Expression and Intellectual Property before the European Courts. Jongsma, D. (2024). Modalities of Fundamental Rights Balancing in EU Copyright Law: Understanding the Use and Abuse of the EU Charter and the Concept of \u201cFair Balance\u201d. Sganga, C. (2020). A new era for EU copyright exceptions and limitations? Judicial flexibility and legislative discretion in the aftermath of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market and the trio of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice. Trapova, A. (2025). Freedom of the arts in copyright law. \u0421\u0442\u0430\u0440\u0447\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e, \u041e. (2025). \u041a\u043e\u043d\u0446\u0435\u043f\u0446\u0456\u044f \u043e\u0440\u0438\u0433\u0456\u043d\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0443 \u0437\u0433\u0456\u0434\u043d\u043e \u0437 \u0440\u0456\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u0421\u0443\u0434\u0443 \u0421\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043b\u0438\u0432\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0421\u043e\u044e\u0437\u0443. \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456. 2, 5\u201312. Theory and practice of intellectual property\u2116 3 \/ 2026 ISSN (Print) 2308-0361ISSN (Online) 2519-2744 DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/tpip.2026.3.8 Submitted 2026-07-24Accepted 2026-08-11Published 2026-09-10 Balancing of public and private interests when applying copyright and neighboring rights exceptions and limitations in the EU case law Maksym NaumkoPhD student,Intellectual Property Scientific Research Instituteof the National Academy of Legal […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-11772","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11772","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11772"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11772\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11777,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11772\/revisions\/11777"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11772"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Accepted 2026-08-11
Published 2026-09-10<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CC-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
PhD student,
Intellectual Property Scientific Research Institute
of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine
https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-0734-0235<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>The article examines the balance between public and private interests in the application of copyright and related rights exceptions and limitations in the CJEU\u2019s case law, as well as the prospects for the development of its case law in light of the proliferation of artificial intelligence tools. It establishes that CJEU adheres to a narrow interpretation of exceptions and limitations to copyright and related rights to ensure a high level of protection for the rights of authors and other rights holders, and considers that the exhaustive list of exceptions and limitations provided for in the EU directives is sufficient to ensure a fair balance of interests. The article concludes that these trends will also be reflected in future decisions of CJEU in cases concerning application of exceptions and limitations in the context of the use of artificial intelligence systems, in particular by holding that the exceptions and limitations to copyright and related rights existing under EU law do not apply to the training of artificial intelligence models for commercial purposes, given the technological differences between the text and data mining and the training of generative artificial intelligence models for commercial purposes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.4916921<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/hdl.handle.net\/2078.5\/41015<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.2613454<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.3976407<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.5923642<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.5051887<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3804228<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=6478780<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/22025.332476<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"