![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/018-cover-734x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nTheory and practice of intellectual property
\u2116 5 \/ 2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ISSN (Print) 2308-0361
ISSN (Online) 2519-2744<\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/test.inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/free-icon-pdf-201153.png\"){kind=icon}
PDF (English)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nDOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/52019.186311<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Published \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02019-12-15<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n Right of reproduction and right of making available to the public in the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Kostiantyn Zerov<\/strong> Abstract Keywords: <\/strong>reproduction, communication to the public, making available, Association Agreement<\/p>\n\n\n\n References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Law of Ukraine \u00abOn International Treaties of Ukraine\u00bb. Ukraine: Case No 910\/14972\/17 Zentiva k.s. v MEDTU and Alliance of Beauty [2018] Supreme Court. Ukraine: Case No 910\/4947\/18 Kanzjut, Llc v MEDTU and TVI.ua, Llc. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. Guide to the copyright and related rights treaties administered by WIPO and glossary of copyright and related rights terms. Directive 2001\/29\/EC on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part. Law of Ukraine \u00abOn Copyright and Related Rights\u00bb. Kerever. A. 1997. Problems Involved in the Adaptation of the Right of Reproduction and the Right of Communication to the Public in the Digital Multimedia Environment. Copyright Bulletin, vol. 31, n.\u00b0 2, p. 4\u221224.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Agreed Statements concerning the WIPO Copyright Treaty. Judgment of the Court of 4 October 2011. Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others (C-403\/08) and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-429\/08). ECLI:EU:C:2011:631. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 7 March 2013 ITV Broadcasting Ltd and Others v TVCatchUp Ltd. Case C-607\/11. ECLI:EU:C:2013:147. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 15 March 2012. Societ\u00e0 Consortile Fonografici (SCF) v Marco Del Corso. Case C-135\/10. ECLI:EU:C:2012:140. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union \u2014 Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union \u2014 Protocols \u2014 Annexes \u2014 Declarations annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 \u2014 Tables of equivalences. IPcuria.eu, IP case law of the CJEU. Article 2 \u2014 Reproduction right. URL: https:\/\/ipcuria.eu\/browse?id_category=29&Article-2-Reproduction-right<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CC-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Ukraine<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>The article deals with the analysis of two specific exclusive economic rights: the right of reproduction and the right of making available of works to the public in such a way that members of the public may access these works from a place and at a time individually chosen by them and compares them under the domestic Ukrainian legislation and under the EU-Ukraine Association agreement. The concepts of \u00abreproduction\u00bb and of \u00abcommunication to the public\u00bb are considered. It is concluded that the right of reproduction is the most basic right since it forms the basis of most forms of exploitation of a work. Reproduction is, in reality, the copying of a work in any manner or form. At the same time, it remains uncertain in Ukraine at the legislative level that the right to reproduction of work includes direct or indirect reproduction and reproduction in whole or in part. These issues are up to the court to decide. It is concluded that the approach when the right of making available of works to the public is included in the broader \u00abright of communication to the public\u00bb is applied in the EU Member States (Articles 3 and 4 of Directive 2001\/29 \/EC) and is reflected in Art. 174 Association Agreement. In addition, the concept of communication to the public in the EU must be construed broadly, as referring to any transmission of the protected works, irrespective of the technical means or process used, this concept includes two cumulative criteria, namely, an \u2018act of communication\u2019 of a work and the communication of that work to a \u2018public\u2019. This approach should be implemented in the Ukrainian legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/1906-15<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/75399206<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/reyestr.court.gov.ua\/Review\/82858256<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.wipo.int\/treaties\/en\/text.jsp?file_id=283698<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.wipo.int\/edocs\/pubdocs\/en\/copyright\/891\/wipo_pub_891.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=CELEX%3A32001L0029<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/ALL\/?uri=CELEX%3A22014A0529%2801%29<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/zakon.rada.gov.ua\/laws\/show\/3792-12<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/wipolex.wipo.int\/en\/text\/295456<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/HTML.\/?uri=CELEX:12012E\/TXT&from=EN<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n