![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/018-cover-734x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nTheory and practice of intellectual property
\u2116 1 \/ 2020<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ISSN (Print) 2308-0361
ISSN (Online) 2519-2744<\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/test.inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/free-icon-pdf-201153.png\"){kind=icon}
PDF (Ukrainian)<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nDOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/12020.200227<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Published \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02020-04-07<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n Limitations and exceptions of economic copyright: balance of private and public interests<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Liubov Maidanyk<\/strong> Abstract Keywords: <\/strong>exceptions and limitations in copyright, free use of works, balance of interests<\/p>\n\n\n\n References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u041c\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u043a \u041b. \u0420. \u041f\u0440\u0438\u043d\u0446\u0438\u043f\u0438 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438: \u043f\u043e\u043d\u044f\u0442\u0442\u044f, \u0432\u0438\u0434\u0438, \u0441\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043c\u0430. \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438. 2017. \u2116 11. \u0421. 181\u2212188.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0422\u0440\u043e\u0446\u044c\u043a\u0430 \u0412. \u0421\u0443\u0442\u043d\u0456\u0441\u0442\u044c \u0432\u0456\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0432\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f \u043e\u0431\u2019\u0454\u043a\u0442\u0456\u0432 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0442\u0430 \u0441\u0443\u043c\u0456\u0436\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432. \u0422\u0435\u043e\u0440\u0456\u044f \u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430 \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456. 2014. \u2116 4. \u0421. 19\u221228.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u041b\u0443\u0442\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430 \u041e. \u041a\u043e\u043d\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0446\u0438\u043e\u043d\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0433\u0443\u043b\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0434\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0438\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0438\u0437\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u0432 \u0442\u0440\u0430\u0441\u0433\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0447\u043d\u043e\u043c \u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u043c \u043e\u0431\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0442\u0435. \u0423\u0433\u043e\u0434\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u043e \u0430\u0441\u043e\u0446\u0456\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044e \u043c\u0456\u0436 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u043e\u044e \u0442\u0430 \u0404\u0421. R. Hilty & S. N\u00e9risson, Balancing Copyright – A Survey of National Approaches, p. 1\u221278, Springer, 2012; Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property & Competition Law Research Paper No. 12-05. \u0420. 20.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Arnold, Richard and Rosati, Eleonora, Are National Courts the Addressees of the InfoSoc Three-Step Test? (July 6, 2015). (2015) 10(10) Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 741-749 . E. Rosati Copyright. 2019. \u0421. 148\u2212149.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u041f\u0440\u043e\u0435\u043a\u0442 \u0417\u0430\u043a\u043e\u043d\u0443 \u0423\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0457\u043d\u0438 \u00ab\u041f\u0440\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0456 \u0441\u0443\u043c\u0456\u0436\u043d\u0456 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430\u00bb \u0432\u0456\u0434 03.2019 \u2116 10143. \u0420\u0456\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0443 \u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043b\u0438\u0432\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u043f\u043e \u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0456 C\u2011435\/12. \u041a\u0430\u043f\u0456\u0446\u0430 \u042e.\u041c. \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043e \u0456\u043d\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0457 \u0432\u043b\u0430\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0421\u043e\u044e\u0437\u0443: \u0444\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0443\u0432\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f, \u0456\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0442\u0438, \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u044f\u043c\u0438 \u0440\u043e\u0437\u0432\u0438\u0442\u043a\u0443. 2017. \u0421. 161.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0417\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u043a\u043d\u0438\u0433\u0430 \u0449\u043e\u0434\u043e \u0440\u043e\u0437\u043f\u043e\u0432\u0441\u044e\u0434\u0436\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0430\u0443\u0434\u0456\u043e\u0432\u0456\u0437\u0443\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0456\u0432 \u0443 \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u043c\u0443 \u0421\u043e\u044e\u0437\u0456: \u043c\u043e\u0436\u043b\u0438\u0432\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0442\u0430 \u0432\u0438\u043a\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0438 \u0443 \u043d\u0430\u043f\u0440\u044f\u043c\u0456 \u0441\u0442\u0432\u043e\u0440\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0454\u0434\u0438\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0446\u0438\u0444\u0440\u043e\u0432\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0440\u0438\u043d\u043a\u0443. \u0421\u0430\u0439\u0442 \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0457 \u043a\u043e\u043c\u0456\u0441\u0456\u0457. \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0434\u0435\u043a\u0441 \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430. Jane C. Ginsburg. European Copyright Code \u2013Back to First Principles (with some additional detail). P. 26\u221227. \u0420\u0456\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u0404\u0432\u0440\u043e\u043f\u0435\u0439\u0441\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0443 \u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043b\u0438\u0432\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u043f\u043e \u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0456 C-516\/17 Spiegel Online. Theory and practice of intellectual property\u2116 1 \/ 2020 ISSN (Print) 2308-0361ISSN (Online) 2519-2744 DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33731\/12020.200227 Published \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02020-04-07 Limitations and exceptions of economic copyright: balance of private and public interests Liubov MaidanykUkrainehttps:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1794-4513 AbstractThe article is devoted to the research of the balance between private and public interests through the concept of exceptions and limitations on […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-10304","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10304"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10304\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10306,"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10304\/revisions\/10306"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/inprojournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/CC-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Ukraine
https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1794-4513<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>The article is devoted to the research of the balance between private and public interests through the concept of exceptions and limitations on economic rights of author. The concept of free use of works applied in the legislation of Ukraine is analyzed, as well as exceptions and limitations on copyrights inherent in the copyright of the European Union. It is concluded that the concept of \u00abfree use\u00bb in the context of copyright is not used in the legislation of most countries of the world, and is inherent in the Ukrainian Law of Ukraine \u00abOn Copyright and Related Rights\u00bb. Copyright limitations and exceptions in the specific cases are envisaged in the laws of different countries of the world by the following two main systems: a system of general abstract principles implemented in common law countries (‘fair use’ in the US and ‘fair dealing’ in the UK, Canada). The first approach is characterized by the fact that a generally exhaustive list of ways of free use of works is provided for in a legislative act and does not allow for the consideration of additional general principles. The second, implies that the court applies the general principles (first and foremost the principle of fair use) and pre-established criteria to determine the lawfulness of a use. The three-step test of the Berne Convention and its relevance to the copyright of Ukraine and the EU are being analyzed. The three-step test, as one of the means of ensuring a balance of private and public interest in copyright, can be used both in law-making and in court-specific dispute resolution. The different approaches to copyright exceptions proposed in the draft Wittem Group’s copyright code are explored compared to those existing in the European Union Directive on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. It is noted that the draft Wittem Group’s Copyright Code differs from that adopted in the EU and Ukraine in that it provides for an open list of cases of use of copyright objects, thereby altering the existing balance of interests towards the public. Copyright restrictions in the said Directive apply to specific proprietary rights under certain conditions, which may include the purpose, subjects and specific scope, which provides for a list of exceptions and restrictions that are considered to be closed and not subject to extended interpretation in their content.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.kiaplaw.ru\/press-centr\/public\/konvencionnoe-regulirovanie.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/trade.ec.europa.eu\/doclib\/docs\/2016\/november\/tradoc_155103.pdf<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=2627014<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/search.ligazakon.ua\/l_doc2.nsf\/link1\/JH7TR00A.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf;jsessionid=E7AC1C113FDD0E4C15165CBDAB6E4571?text=&docid=150786&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=16878<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.eesc.europa.eu\/en\/our-work\/opinions-information-reports\/opinions\/single-market-intellectual-property-rights<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/www.ivir.nl\/copyrightcode\/european-copyright-code\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/poseidon01.ssrn.com\/delivery.php?ID=725114106069104019078070073109077074039034001032090029097069107029094008077031110025033036016025122120037084104119101002110119039072071083031123029002115074097015059075013007106108023097090074111101116086093030103007009075096068006005023029012119086&EXT=pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text&docid=216543&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir&occ=first&part=1&cid=4742136<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"